sam's notes

notes on government, sports and popular culture

Saturday, June 11, 2005

 
I was watching the Braves-A's game last night when Chip Carey and Joe Simpson began a broader discussion of interleague play. True, there were some intriguing matchups this weekend, including Cubs- Red Sox, meeting for the first time since 1918, and Giants-Indians, meeting for the first time since1954. But other matchups such as Marlins-Rangers and Rockies-Tigers were a little flat.

The other major issue is the unbalanced schedule. The most glaring inequity is in late June, when the Braves and Marlins play a crucial home-and-home series. But sandwiched between that series is the last round of interleague play where geographic rivals square off. The Marlins get Tampa Bay (20-41) while the Braves play Baltimore (36-24). Who has an advantage there? Then again, who could predict the Orioles would be so strong this season?

Carey's solution: Balance the schedule so that everybody plays everybody, period. Two home-and-home series against division rivals, one home-and-home against league rivals and then a single series against teams in the other league. The Braves go to Boston one season and the Red Sox come to Atlanta the next season, for example. If you're going to do interleague play, then do it, Carey reasons.

I like it, because interleague play is just a reality we pruists have to accept. It will also make crucial games between division rivals a hotter ticket, so to speak.


Archives

June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?